|KEC>CmR+++>$ Exp+++ SPM++ Syn+ Nov- Cot Wool+ Lux+++ Stash+ Scale++ Fin Ent-- FI+ Int Tex++ Lace++ Felt Flat+ Circ++ DPN+ ML+ Swatch@ KIP+++ Blog++ FO++ WIP+++ AltX+SwSp-|
Friday, June 20, 2014
Lack of detail
(To recap: I'm currently catching up on describing three and a half months of knitting when I didn't blog.)
So after the sock parade at the beginning of the year, I turned to design work.
I made a gorgeous baby gift for an expecting co-worker. Now, the pattern I used is not mine, but the colourwork motif that I substituted in is, so unfortunately I'm not going to show pictures. (Which is a tremendous shame, because it came out awesome and I'm really proud of it.) The pattern was the absolutely adorable Woobie Zebra, by Kris Carlson, whose second volume of "woobie" patterns I really should get around to buying, because they're all so freakin' cute.
Shortly afterwards, I used that same colourwork motif in an accessory that I recently submitted somewhere (fingers crossed!), and then yarn support for two more designs started to arrive. Again, no pictures, no details, but I'll be able to reveal more in the fall when the issues they're being published in come out. As always, I'm ridiculously excited about the prospect of seeing my name in print and sharing my patterns with The World.
The only thing I was working on around this time that I can talk about is a blue fuzzy giraffe toy that I'm hoping to have finished in time for DD3's birthday in mid-late August. I had started it waaaaay back when she was only about four months old, but abandoned it pathetically fast after I'd barely completed the first hoof.
The problem, of course, lies with that adjective "fuzzy". The yarn is Sirdar Snuggly Snowflake DK, which is as deliciously soft and baby toy-appropriate as you would expect a microfibre novelty yarn to be, but is as much of a b***h to work with as you would also expect. I'd forgotten where I'd left off and hadn't taken notes about that, and it was quite impossible to figure out where the heck I was in the pattern just by "reading the knitting" (or in this case, "reading the indistinct fuzz").
Finally, I gave up and ripped out the whole first hoof and started again. I have made significant progress:
(Yes, I know what that looks like! Shut up, okay? It'll look more like giraffe legs later on.)
...but have since put the whole thing back down again. With any luck, I'll be able to work up the chutzpah in the next month or so to start leg #3.
Next time: cabled sweaters, plural!
4:57 PM 1 comments
Wednesday, June 18, 2014
It's been how long?!?
I'm not quite sure what happened, but the blogging really fell to the wayside after my last post. (Obviously!) So here we are about three and a half months later, and there's been a heck of a lot of knitting to tell you about. I won't even try to get to everything in a single post, but if I start at the beginning and move forward, I'm sure I'll catch myself up at some point.
Why don't we start with socks?
In February, I finally, finally finished the cuff of the second sock from a pair I started last summer. What had stopped me in my tracks was getting to the end of one ball of yarn, and not feeling like re-threading a bunch of beads onto the replacement ball of yarn. (You know how that is, right?)
But once I'd steeled myself for the tedious re-threading, it wasn't long before my eldest daughter had herself a really gorgeous pair of new socks:
A few days after finishing those, I was apparently still on a socks kick, because I grabbed a 100g ball of Regia Blitz Color (colourway #02527) and made a pair of socks for my middlest:
And then, from the leftovers, I made another pair for my eldest:
After that, I moved onto other things...which I'll talk about in a future post. (Honest!)
4:59 PM 0 comments
Wednesday, March 05, 2014
Every now and then I get inquiries or see posts about modifying my Arguyle men's sweater (gansey) pattern. People seem to really like it (whee!), but they sometimes want to use a different yarn weight, or switch around which charts appear on the sweater from what the size they're working ask for, or...that kind of thing. I've read things like,
And I always get really nervous and want to immediately tell people, "WAIT! STOP RIGHT THERE!" Because Arguyle is one of those garments where the different elements come together all interconnectedly; so if you make adjustments in one direction, you have to make them in a bunch of other directions, too. Therefore, making adjustments is sort of fraught with risk.
So I thought I'd write a post out about it, so that anyone who's thinking of messing with it can go into it with a whole bunch of "inside information" and hopefully avoid the rather painful situation of doing a whole bunch of knitting that has to be frogged near the end because it didn't work the way they wanted it to.
Possibly the most important thing
First and foremost, I cannot stress enough that whether you're following the pattern completely faithfully or making serious modification to it, SWATCHING and WASHING THOSE SWATCHES and GETTING THE GAUGE YOU WANT ON YOUR WASHED SWATCHES is extremely crucial. Please don't skip that part. I know, I know, it's a real pain in the ass, and trust me, I'm just as guilty of saying 'to hell with swatching' and just getting on with the business of making something most of the time, but in this case, it's super-important. Honest. And if you need visual proof of why it's so important to WASH the swatch, check out the difference between the following two photographs...
Firstly, there's this, which hasn't been blocked yet - it looks very lumpy and will clearly get bigger after blocking:
And then there's this, which has been blocked - the fabric has been stretched and is much smoother:
Big difference. So wash and block those swatches.
And now, the nitty-gritty
There are a few things about the sweater that are quite easy to adjust:
That, however, is just about where the simplicity ends.
Let's say that you want to use a different weight of yarn. You could simply change needle size in order to get gauge - but (as with all knitting), this will affect the density of the fabric you knit. Using thinner yarn on a bigger needle may give you a fabric so thin that it's not warm enough for its purpose, or that it doesn't show the motifs very nicely. Using thicker yarn on a smaller needle may give you a fabric so thick that the sweater stands up by itself without anyone in it! So make sure that you use a combination of yarn and needle size that gives you a fabric you're happy with.
Once that's done, and you know your gauge, and if the gauge is different from what's specified in the pattern, it's time to start thinking about all the variables at play that you need to worry about in order to get the same measurements as given in the pattern schematic.
The upshot is that you'll have to regrade and redesign the majority of the darn thing. Sorry there's no easy fix for this! The whole thing is just that mathematically interdependent.
But let's say that you are willing to regrade, redesign, and/or shuffle the motifs around. In that case, you'll want to keep in mind some basic "ground rules" for putting the different charts together:
And there you have it. Go nuts!
The large size and the double-argyle motif
There's one more, very specific, modification that I want to discuss before I end this post, and that's the fact that there is no Chart F (that's the double argyle motif) used anywhere in the "large" size of the sweater. I've seen at least two people point out that this is a shame, and I have to admit, I agree with this sentiment completely. I love Chart F, and I tried super-hard to work it into every size, but simply couldn't figure out a way for it to be done in large.
One lovely person asked if they couldn't replace the "Chart A, K1, Chart A" combination in the centre front and back with "K3, Chart F, K3" or "K1, P1, K1, Chart F, K1, P1, K1", because it would still add up to 35 stitches. And unfortunately, the answer is no, because remember, it's not about number of stitches, but rather, overall width (47" in the case of the large size) when you put the combination together.
Here's how the body of the large size breaks down:
You can see that, given the "ground rules" for combining the charts that I mentioned earlier, the replacement of "Chart A, K1, Chart A" with "K3, Chart F, K3" or "K1, P1, K1, Chart F, K1, P1, K1" wouldn't work, because then you'd have a knit stitch right after finishing Chart C and right before starting a Chart B (which is against the "ground rules"). So you're sort of stuck with replacing "Chart A, K1, Chart A" with simply "Chart F", which really doesn't work, because "Chart A, K1, Chart A" is 5.75" wide and "Chart F" is only 4.5" wide. That's a difference of 1.25". That means you'd have to put something extra on each side of the Chart F that's 0.625" each.
What I did think might work was replacing "Chart A, K1, Chart A" with "P2, K1, Chart F, K1, P2". The extra P2s would throw off the consistency of the spacing between the charts a bit (which is probably why I didn't think of it originally), but if you don't mind that look, it could be a winning solution! Again - SWATCH FIRST if you're trying to do this. If it turns out too big, you might try substituting "P1, K1, Chart F, K1, P1" instead; if it turns out too small, you might try "P3, K1, Chart F, K1, P3" instead...you get the idea.
At last, the end of this post
Anyway, I know all that is very long and complicated, but I thought that, for those who want to forge ahead with significant changes to the sizing, all this extra info might be helpful.
Enjoy the knitting!
10:04 PM 0 comments